When the Brain Breaks

In May 2025 Jia Tolentino wrote in the New Yorker about what she calls her “broken brain.” She means the fog that settles when words slip out of focus, when news feeds pile horror upon horror, and when reality itself feels unreliable.

“I feel a troubling kind of opacity in my brain lately – as if reality were becoming illegible, as if language were a vessel with holes in the bottom and meaning was leaking all over the floor”.

She blames the speed of politics, the flood of images from Gaza, and the creeping invasion of synthetic fakery – AI faces, deepfakes, doctored clips – until the act of paying attention itself becomes exhausting.

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-weekend-essay/my-brain-finally-broke

It struck a chord with me, having been circling the same ideas for years. Newsfeed numbness – the more you see of violence, cruelty, and collapse, the less able you are to feel. The moral compass does not shatter – it just spins helplessly, like a needle over too many magnets.

Tolentino writes as an American essayist cataloguing the psychic toll of her own culture. But her “broken brain” is our common inheritance. The overload is global, the denial universal. I saw it in Thailand during the unrest of 2008, when rolling street protests became background noise; I see it in France today, where ecological breakdown and bureaucratic inertia pile on top of daily political crises. The pattern is the same: we are running systems – political, technological, ecological – at a pace no mind can process, let alone resist. Outrage itself feels redundant. And that, perhaps, is the point: flood people with so many grotesque headlines, so much noise and spectacle, that resistance fragments before it can gather force, or else curdles into manipulated anger – from America’s culture wars to Europe’s street protests and beyond. The instinctive are swept into fury; the deliberative sink into fog. Both serve the same end.

“The phone eats time; it makes us live the way people do inside a casino, dropping a blackout curtain over the windows to block out the world, except the blackout curtain is a screen, showing too much of the world, too quickly”.

This progression is brutally simple. Overload collapses empathy; numbness follows; then the very act of looking becomes unreliable. Images of suffering blur into AI hallucinations, real protest footage sits beside doctored clips, and even a child’s search results are contaminated with fakes. The result is not only fatigue, but a collapse of trust in perception itself – and numbness is not neutral. It is precisely what power structures rely on: a dazed public is easier to rule.

“Fake images of real people, real images of fake people; fake stories about real things, real stories about fake things. … The words blur and the images blur … a permission structure is erected for us to detach from reality – first for a moment, then a day, a week, an election season, maybe a lifetime”.

And detachment has a cost. It runs alongside policy changes that cut into daily life – deportations under Trump’s new orders, benefits pared back in the US, NHS waiting lists stretching beyond endurance in Britain, droughts and floods forcing migration in Asia. Authoritarian gestures are dressed up as routine governance, and by the time we notice, the damage is already done. This is not just about our minds. It is how cruelty advances while we are too dazed to resist.

I find Tolentino’s essay oddly reassuring. Not because it offers a cure, but because it confirms that even sharp observers and writers are buckling under the same weight as the rest of us. The failure is not mine alone, or yours. It is structural. Our minds were never designed for this volume of horror, this speed of contradiction, this corrosion of truth.

Perhaps the task is not to repair the mind at all, but to notice – clearly, stubbornly – that the fracture is everywhere. Naming it is resistance. What we do with that knowledge will mark the fate of our civilisation.

When The Ocean’s Cities Fall Silent

Once, this was a living coral – a complex city of polyps, feeding and breathing in warm tropical waters.

Now it lies bleached and brittle on a Chumphon shoreline, carved by time and tide into a relic of itself.

A single Asian weaver ant explores the labyrinth where an ocean colony once thrived.


Brain coral, long dead, now carried ashore – an ant tracing the outline of a vanished ecosystem.

Life continues, but on a smaller scale – as it always does when the great systems fail.

Along much of Thailand’s coast, pieces like this have been washing up more often. The Gulf has warmed sharply over recent years, and surveys across both the Gulf and the Andaman show widespread bleaching – in some shallow zones as high as 80–90 per cent. Even protected marine parks have reported repeated stress events, the kind reefs cannot fully recover from.

The coral in my hand is just one fragment, but it speaks to a wider pattern: systems under pressure, ecosystems thinning out, and the quiet arrival of signs most people only notice when they are already too late.

Sometimes the tide brings in more than shells.

Fossilised brain coral (family Faviidae), Chumphon, Thailand.


Coral fragments along the Chumphon shoreline, each a small reminder of what the Gulf has been losing.

Up the Khlong Without a Clue

By some feat of navigational incompetence – possibly involving an upside-down online compass or Google Maps pointing every which way except the desired direction (and certainly not my own misplaced sense of direction) – I managed to take the E-line khlong boat from Thonglor Pier entirely the opposite way. Not slightly wrong, not “I’ll hop off in two stops and fix it”, but full, unwavering commitment to the error. Quite an achievement, given that the Saen Saep line offers only two options: towards the city, or towards parts unknown. Naturally, I chose the latter.

These boats have been racing up and down the canal since the 1990s, powered by ageing diesel engines that sound like a WWII submarine clearing its throat. They nominally carry around a hundred passengers, though on this particular afternoon it felt more like a hundred and fifty, plus my backpack. I doubt anyone keeps count.

Mine was packed to the gunwales. I sensibly positioned myself in a seemingly generous gap between bodies, only to discover why it had been left unclaimed. The tarpaulin roof is made of overlapping, sagging panels, each collecting its own private lake of rainwater. One enthusiastic lurch and an entire reservoir emptied itself directly onto my head, to the thinly disguised amusement of nearby seasoned commuters. I managed a resigned smile as the water trickled briskly down my spine. Bangkok canal travel initiation: complete.

Fifteen stops later – thunder cracking, lightning flashing, and the scenery becoming ever more obscure – I conceded that the surroundings were not going to become familiar. Time to get off.

Embarking and disembarking were adventures of their own. The boats do not exactly stop; they merely flirt with the idea of slowing down. In that theatrical split second, a wiry, perpetually exasperated crewman – the conductor, who hops on and off with feline agility – loops a rope around a bollard just long enough for passengers to throw themselves on or off. My own attempt was greeted with an expression combining pity, urgency, and the faintly hopeful assumption that I would not fall in.

I had arrived at a gloomy, deserted pier whose roof leaked in sympathy with the boat’s. The location could best be described as “somewhere in Bangkok, technically”. A flash of lightning illuminated corrugated shacks and shadowy warehouses, and the following crack of thunder delivered a distinctly Calvino-esque jolt — the sort of Bangkok backwater where, in Christopher G. Moore’s Vincent Calvino novels, rain hammers on corrugated roofs, shadows gather in unhelpful places, and a wrong turn tends to precede something regrettable happening to the detective.

“In the end, we are all characters in other people’s stories”

https://www.christophergmoore.com/product-page/district-18 – District #3 – a Vincent Calvino crime novel, 18th in the series

Mercifully, although khlong boats do not run far into the night, one appeared. Another eighteen baht bought me a place on a blissfully emptier vessel – this time heading the way I had intended all along – and I retraced my unintended odyssey, complete with the expected splashes, sharp turns, and several enthusiastic near-collisions with oncoming traffic.

True to form, I still overshot Asoke Pier by two stops, but E5 and Phetchaburi MRT were perfectly serviceable. After my brief career as a maritime liability, I decided it was far safer to continue underground.

Paris: Coffee, Illusions, and Fifty-Four Years of Not Growing Up

Same pose, same friendship, slightly fewer questionable fashion choices

August 2025, and back in Paris with Ian – fifty-four years after we first met as teens in Harrogate – and still managing to enjoy ourselves without needing an afternoon nap. Mostly.

Bacha Coffee: Breakfast With an Ego Problem

Because nothing says “morning coffee” like walking into a café that looks ready for a diplomatic summit.

One morning began at Bacha Coffee on the Champs Élysées, a café so polished you feel underdressed the moment you step inside. Chandeliers, lacquered wood, immaculate black-and-white floors… the sort of place where asking for a straightforward coffee feels like using the wrong cutlery.

When your breakfast has better lighting than most theatres.

The menu resembles a geography exam. Brazil, Yemen, Colombia, Burundi on just one of a dozen pages. All reasonably priced at a mere €9.50 – until you reach the Café Paraíso Gold at €324.

Yes, €324 per cup. Not per kilo. Not per lifetime supply.

And for those who read to the middle of the menu, the legendary Café Camocim Jacu Bird sits there at €104 a cup – beans (“cherries”, to coffee geeks) having taken a brief detour through the digestive system of a Brazilian bird before ending up in your porcelain. Apparently some people will pay a small fortune for coffee that has already been swallowed once. Call it recycling for the obscenely rich.

€9.50 coffee, priceless sense of superiority. The goblets help.

We settled for the sensible Brazilian brew, pastries, fresh orange juice and the satisfaction of not needing to re-mortgage anything to pay the bill.

Bacha Coffee: where even the loo has delusions of grandeur.

Evenings: Bistrot Tables and the Illusion of Youth

We came perilously close to visiting the famed Caveau de la Huchette in the 5th arrondissement, but the queue stretching down the street looked worryingly young and suspiciously immobile. We appeared to be at least a generation and a half older than the next oldest person in line.

Leaving Ian to hold our place, I approached the doorman to ask what the odds were. He gave me a full top-to-toe assessment and told me to “go in and have a look” – clearly having concluded that I was unlikely to vanish into the depths of the club without returning to pay. I am still not sure whether that was a compliment, an insult, or simply accurate risk assessment on his part.

Inside, every seat in the live-music basement was taken, and with bodies already packed tightly enough to qualify as a health warning, we made the sensible decision: retreat, locate something with chairs, and give our ageing joints the evening they deserved.

The piano bar at Café Georges V across the road fitted the bill perfectly – here the singer performs on the piano, and the audience appreciates it from the comfort of actual seats. Civilised nightlife for those of us born before Spotify.


Georges V piano bar: performer on the piano, patrons on chairs. Perfect balance.

Other evenings were more familiar: Parisian terraces, cold beer, good food and wine, and the sort of people-watching that passes for entertainment once you reach a certain age.

Later, a wander along the Seine – Eiffel Tower glowing obligingly in the background – and a brief moment of “yes, growing old gracefully is not so bad”.

After multiple attempts, we managed a photo that made Ian look decades younger. Darkness is nature’s Photoshop.

Musée de l’Illusion: Dignity Optional

In a clear sign that either maturity has bypassed us or we are simply beyond caring, we spent part of an afternoon at the Musée de l’Illusion.

Heads on plates.

Giant chairs that shrink you to garden-gnome size.

Handstands.

Rooms designed specifically to make adults look ridiculous, which of course we embraced immediately.

Coffee Pilgrimage, Part Two

Paris also delivered on its other speciality: very good coffee in very small cafés.

Terres de Café offered yellow tables, perfect Arabica espressos and generous slices of cake – the sort of combination that makes you feel briefly optimistic about everything, even your bank statement after Bacha.

Fifty-Four Years and Counting

Fifty-four years of friendship and, frankly, we still behave like the same two teenagers from our days in Harrogate. Just with earlier bedtimes. Different countries, different lives, long stretches without meeting – but whenever we do, the conversation resumes as if we were in the pub last Friday night.

Paris gave us the usual routine: resurrecting old stories, laughing about who misremembered what, and at antics that would baffle – and occasionally shock – anyone under forty. Apparently some double acts just keep going, whether the world has asked for them or not.

But there is also that faint, unwelcome voice in the background reminding us that we are not stockpiling infinite future trips.

So we make the most of the ones we get.

Still Standing

Paris snapshots from last week… still standing, still laughing, and still proving that growing older does not necessarily mean growing up.

It just means you schedule your fun between coffee stops.

Two sadly gone, two untraceable, and two still here pretending to behave. Amazing any of us made it past those haircuts.

Another Age

Well, if one must wait for a delayed TGV, this is surely how to do it – sinking into a leather armchair beneath chandeliers and gilt, in the quiet splendour of Le Train Bleu. 10€ may seem steep for a double shot of caffeine – even a Finca El Platanillo 100% Guatemalan Arabica, cultivated at 1450m – but context is everything – and here, nestled into a leather armchair at Le Train Bleu, you are not paying for coffee so much as an experience.

Besides, you get a free madeleine on the side, and with a single shot at €7, the double almost counts as thrift. Almost.

In this echo of another age, even a delay becomes something almost deliberate – an invitation to linger rather than rush. Opened in 1901 for the Universal Exhibition, Le Train Bleu is a showcase of Belle Époque grandeur and Beaux-Arts theatricality… painted ceilings, sculpted cherubs, and a setting that once welcomed travellers bound for the Riviera, Cairo, and Constantinople.

There is time, here. And perhaps that is the rarest luxury of all.

How to Earn Your Lunch in Provence

Sometimes the best way to silence the newsfeed, the static, the murk of thought, is to lace up your shoes and head for higher ground. This morning, I did just that – setting off early with my indefatigable four-legged companion, Glo, for a fast 9.6 km hike through the garrigue behind the Colline Saint-Jacques in Cavaillon.

Glo is a rescue – of entirely indecipherable ancestry and unbothered by the mystery. When I adopted her in September 2019, she was five months old, skin clinging to bone, with a look in her eyes that spoke of beatings and bites and a life already too full of fear. She had been chewed – quite literally – by other dogs, and the world, understandably, made no sense to her. It has taken years, but much of that fear has gone. She still startles at sudden movement or unexpected noise, but in open spaces, on winding trails, nose twitching and eyes scanning the horizon, she is transformed. Steady, alert, and inseparable. What remains of her past now follows behind us – at a good distance.

The route itself was anything but tame. Twisting rocky paths, sudden inclines, a few scrambles, and more than a few sections tipping into “peak exertion” – according to the tracker, at least. But the physical effort was laced with something deeper. A sense of continuity, of walking quite literally in the footsteps of thousands who passed this way before.

Saint-Jacques has been occupied since the Neolithic. At La Grande Baume, a cave still sheltering in the limestone, our ancestors left flints and arrowheads – but no trace of themselves beyond that. Romans later carved their passage through the rock at Le Passage en Tranchée, their carts biting ruts deep into the stone. Quarrymen followed in later centuries, chiselling into the hillsides at Les Carrières, leaving behind the ghost grid of their labour. The paths loops through it all, past dry gorges, shaded ravines, low holm (evergreen) oaks and sun-shattered cliffs. Glo, wiser than me, took the steeper stretches at her own unhurried pace, pausing to sprawl in the shade with the confidence of a creature who knows the heat will always outlast us.

After nearly ten kilometres and a fair bit of sweat, we descended into town – dusty, satisfied, and ready for something restorative. I dropped Glo off at home for a well-earned nap in a cool corner, then made my way solo to Bistrot Ô Méryl, tucked under the plane trees by the Hôtel de Ville.

L’Assiette ô Meryl arrived like a love letter to Provence on a plate. First, a half of chilled Cavaillon melon, served plain but dusted elegantly with piment d’Espelette – sweet, cool, with just the faintest warmth on the tongue. Then the main affair: a generous salad of local greens dressed in light vinaigrette, overlaid with folds of cured ham, thick shavings of aged cheese, confit tomatoes bursting with intensity, and thin grilled slices of aubergine just kissed by the flame. Anchoring the whole dish were two slices of courgette terrine – a savoury loaf packed with slices of summer squash, bound in herbed egg, baked to just the right balance of soft and firm.

It was rustic without being rough. Thoughtful without being precious. Paired with the rosé maison – pale, dry, and properly cold – it did not so much rejuvenate as reassure: yes, some things still make sense.

To finish, I wandered across to Café-s-Hop Cavaillon, my favourite little torrefaction spot in town. Glo stayed home, sleeping off the morning’s adventure. Inside, framed hessian coffee sacks and shelves of beans and paperbacks lined the walls. Tourists and a few locals lingered over laptops or shared low conversation, the whole place running on the unspoken agreement that time could afford to move slowly, just for a while.

An espresso – no embellishments, no sugar, just beans and heat and clarity – was the final punctuation mark. Well, nearly.

There was cake. Of course there was cake. A rustic slice – peach and red fruit folded into a golden sponge, gently sweet, served with a curl of ripe peach and a spoonful of crème fraîche just tart enough to restore perspective. Simple, and perfect.

Inflation, Illusion, and the Populist Payday

Inflation is often sold as a mysterious force in mainstream commentary – like weather, or fate. In reality, it is a predictable redistribution mechanism. A stealth tax. And like most mechanisms in our economic system, it redistributes to the few. It’s a pipeline – straight from your pocket to theirs. A slow, silent redistribution of value upwards, wrapped in economic jargon and blamed on whatever is culturally convenient.. globalists, migrants, wind farms, your neighbour’s pronouns. Yes, energy shocks and supply issues play a role. But who ends up better off after the dust settles? Not you.

The Winners?

  • Governments groaning under debt (they repay with devalued money).
  • Borrowers with fixed-rate loans.
  • Owners of property, stocks, and commodities.
  • Corporations with pricing power.
  • The already rich, who simply rebalance their portfolios and barely feel the breeze.

The Losers?

  • You.
  • Wage earners, pensioners, small businesses.
  • The so-called “middle class”, now largely the working poor with a better wardrobe.

While prices rise and security slips away, people get desperate for someone to blame. And into that void, step the salesmen..

Enter the Snake Oil Populists.. in suits, flags, or fatigues.

They arrive with righteous fury and easy targets. “Your life’s getting harder? Blame the EU. Blame immigrants. Blame the green mafia. Blame the elites in Brussels, London, or Washington”.

But look closer, and the story collapses under its own hypocrisy.

Nigel Farage

Swills pints and rants about sovereignty – while pocketing over £1 million a year from media gigs, crypto promotions, and campaign donations. Net worth? At least £3.2 million – and that is just the declared portion.

Marine Le Pen

Claims to stand for working France – but the lifestyle says otherwise. Between her MP salary, party stipends, and her role as sole heir to Jean-Marie Le Pen’s estate – including a multi-million euro villa in Saint-Cloud – her financial comfort is beyond dispute.

Her father, who died earlier in 2025, was tied to a Swiss trust valued at over €2 million, including gold coins and ingots, as revealed by Mediapart in a 2015 investigation. Whether she benefits directly or not, she now inherits the broader political and financial legacy of one of France’s most entrenched dynasties. Populist on the podium, property heiress on paper.

Viktor Orbán

Waves the flag of Hungarian values – while consolidating media control, funnelling public funds to friends, and ruling over a loyalist oligarchy where nationalism and self-enrichment go hand in hand.

Donald Trump

Back in office, and back on the grift. Claims to be saving the nation – while peddling merchandise, crypto coins, and policy outrage. He imposes tariffs that make Americans pay more, while offering tax breaks for the already wealthy. He promised to drain the swamp. He bottled it, slapped his name on it, and sold it to Americans instead.

Vladimir Putin

Less a populist in the Western electoral sense, more a czar in camouflage. But the performance is familiar: defending tradition, civilisation, the ‘Russian soul’ – all while dissent is crushed, fortunes are hoarded, and ordinary citizens bury their sons.

Officially, he earns a civil servant’s salary. Unofficially, he is linked to a financial empire worth up to $200 billion via oligarchs and offshore proxies. While sanctions bite the public and war drains the economy, the regime’s upper tier remains insulated.

The slogans are nationalistic. The results are plutocratic. Ordinary Russians, meanwhile, face inflation, shortages, and funerals.

Giorgia Meloni

Italy’s “outsider” PM now governs comfortably within the system she once decried – especially when Brussels keeps the money flowing. Loud on cultural warfare, quiet on protecting oligarchic tax perks. She rails against Brussels while happily spending EU money. The rhetoric is nationalist. The reality is fiscal dependency and strategic ambiguity.

And on, and on.

The grift Is the point.

Modern populism is not about fixing problems – it is about monetising resentment.

It follows the TV preacher playbook.

  • Convince people they are under attack.
  • Offer salvation through loyalty and outrage.
  • Live off their fear, their donations, and their despair.

Whether it is miracle water, nationalist rhetoric, or freedom coins, the pitch is always the same:

“Trust me. I’m one of you”.

They are not.
They never were.

Tearing up Churchill’s Legacy

Leaving the ECHR isn’t some fringe fantasy – it’s the next phase of Britain’s post-Brexit drift into isolation and unchecked power. Rejoiners should recognise it as another break from the European consensus we helped build. But it’s not just about Europe – it’s about you. Whether you lean left, right, or you’re still on the fence, this is your warning – the rights they’re dismantling aren’t just for migrants or criminals. They are yours too. And once they’re gone, there’s no one left to appeal to.

𝙒𝙝𝙮 𝙙𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙏𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙍𝙚𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙢 𝙐𝙆 𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙀𝘾𝙃𝙍?

Well, let’s not pretend this is about sovereignty. It’s about impunity. Because it’s the last thing standing between them and unchecked power.

The European Court of Human Rights is that deeply inconvenient body that says – shock, horror – you can’t just lock up autistic people without trial. You can’t ban gays from serving in the army. You can’t spy on your population en masse, deny justice to Hillsborough families, or let police walk away after failing domestic abuse victims. You can’t deport a man to be tortured just because he didn’t fill in form X in triplicate. You know… basic decency. In short, it’s a pain in the arse for authoritarians in suits.

So naturally, the British hard right sees this as a threat. Not to the country – but to themselves. Because it turns out that when you’re flogging nationalism to the masses while handing contracts to your donors and waving through state overreach, the last thing you want is a supranational court saying, “Actually, that’s illegal.”

Reform UK’s take? Bulldoze it. Farage has all but tattooed “Leave the ECHR or Britain dies” on his forehead. It’s his new Brexit. Simpler, nastier, and with even fewer facts attached. It’s not about national sovereignty – it’s about the freedom to punish without consequences.

And the Tories? They’re whispering the same thing while doing their best impression of Serious Legal Minds. Kemi Badenoch’s set up a “lawfare” commission to decide whether we should bin the ECHR? Translation: “We’ve already decided, but want a white paper to hide behind”.

Robert Jenrick says the Tories will die unless they commit to quitting it. Which is weird, since most people thought they were dying because of corruption, cronyism, and burning the country for sport – but sure, blame the court that defends our rights.

They call it “foreign interference”. We call it “not being ruled by bastards”.

The real irony? The ECHR isn’t even an EU institution – it was set up by Churchill’s government after WWII, precisely to stop nations sleepwalking back into authoritarianism. But try explaining that to a Reform voter convinced that asylum seekers are lurking in every box of imported Belgian chocolate, or a Tory backbencher who thinks habeas corpus is Latin for ‘send them back’.

This isn’t about principle. It’s about power. The power to strip rights from you, without the bother of you having anywhere to appeal. Because the wealthy already have legal armour. You? You’ve got the ECHR. For now.

So next time someone parrots the line about “taking back control”, maybe ask – control for whom, exactly?

EDIT – this is for Rejoiners…

It’s vital to understand that leaving the ECHR wouldn’t just gut individual rights – it would also torpedo any future attempt to rejoin the EU. Membership of the Convention is a non-negotiable requirement for all EU states. Walk away from it now, and we don’t just burn bridges – we lock the gates behind us.

– Article 6(3) TEU makes ECHR adherence mandatory

– Leaving would signal a rejection of core EU legal values

– It would collapse judicial cooperation (extradition, data sharing, mutual recognition of rulings)

– Brussels would see the UK as unstable and even more untrustworthy than it does at present

– It would hand a gift to far-right, anti-democratic governments inside the EU (like Hungary’s), who would point to the UK as proof that you can abandon rights commitments and still expect trade and cooperation.

So yes – it matters greatly, if you care about returning to Europe. This kills that prospect stone dead.

We Are The Tide

What the sea remembers, the land forgets.

The first people to walk this green and pleasant land came from Africa.
Not recently – but in the long dawn of our species, when the only borders were rivers and mountain ranges, and the only language was survival.

They carried no papers or flags. They followed herds, water, warmth.
They crossed what was once land, and what would one day become sea, and left only stone tools, footprints, and genes in their wake.

They were not white – and whiteness had not yet been invented.
That came later, gradually and imperfectly, through ice and pigment, adaptation and isolation.

Evolution, not entitlement.

And still, they moved. Across rivers and seas, over ridges, through forests, to the islands.
Long before there was a Britain to be British about, there were people here – wandering, settling, moving again.

The earliest settlers brought fire and language. They carried no passports.

Then came others, in waves, over centuries.
They brought bronze, iron, farming, burial rites, new gods and ghosts, memories and myths.
They came from the west, the east, the near continent –
from what we now call Europe, Asia, the Middle East.

They came because people always have – in search of food, space, safety.
More clement skies. More peaceful and accepting neighbours.

The Celts – only a beginning because the fog of time obscures what came before – were just one ripple in the sediment time left behind.

The Romans followed, with roads and walls and underfloor heating.
Then the Angles, Saxons, Jutes, and Norsemen.
Vikings who came to plunder and stayed to trade.
The Normans came latest of the conquerors, but left their mark in law, language, and stone.

This island has never been still.
Never pure.
Only porous.

And yet somehow, in our painful and lingering post-imperial insularity, we convince ourselves we are the finished product.
Native. Defined. Entitled.

Some scowl at the boats now battling the waves across the Channel –
forgetting that boats carried all of us, if not in our lifetimes, then in the long-forgotten memories of our ancestors.

Some of my own forebears came in chains. Others wielded the whips.
One branch fled Jamaica. Another claimed a Scottish coat of arms.
That is not contradiction. That is Britain.

Every family tree, if traced without blinkers, eventually runs aground on a foreign shore.
Refugee. Coloniser. Indentured labourer. Chancer. Survivor.

We are not a race.
We are a journey.

It is not migration that is new – it is the outrage.
The myth of purity.
The delusion that history and culture start and end at Dover, and that identity can be ring-fenced by fear.

It is not the boats that shame us.
It is how we greet them.